kdeconnect naming

Rick.Timmis Rick.Timmis at Abazander.com
Tue Mar 3 07:30:01 UTC 2015




Jonathan Riddell <jr at jriddell.org> wrote:Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet.  The question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming.

Jonathan

Consistency and following upstream would be my vote. Subtle changes like names can lead to lots of confusion for newbies like me.

HTH
RIck 

On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here.

Scott K

On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a FFe
> and any testers very welcome
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
> ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5
>
> Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
> release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is
> inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just
> kdeconnect.  What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap and
> replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a
> different tar upstream.
>
> Jonathan


--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20150303/7eb7a8c7/attachment.html>


More information about the kubuntu-devel mailing list