One more glitch on finishing the utopic Next upgrade

[Valorie Zimmerman]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Valorie Zimmerman
> <valorie.zimmerman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> sudo dpkg -i --force-overwrite
>>> /var/cache/apt/archives/qml-module-org-kde-runnermodel_5.1.0-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
>>
>> Harald,
>>
>> This is hand-typed; whatever is missing is not allowing any networking
>> on the laptop, wireless OR wired.
>>
>> sudo dpkg -i --force-overwrite
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/qml-module-org-kde-runnermodel_5.1.0-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
>> (Reading database ... 276713 files and directories currently installed.)
>> dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
>> dpkg: warning: trying to overwrite
>> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/qml/org/kde/runnermodel/l/qmldir' which
>> is also in package libkf5runner-bin 5.0.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.10~ppa5
>> dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
>> dpkg: warning: trying to overwrite
>> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/qml/org/kde/runnermodel/librunnermoduleplugin.so'
>> which is also in package package libkf5runner-bin
>> 5.0.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.10~ppa5
>>  qml-module-org-kde-runnermodel depends on libkf5runner5 (>= 4.97.0); however:
>>   Package libkf5runner5 is not configured yet.
>>  qml-module-org-kde-runnermodel depends on libqt5qml5 (>= 5.0.2); however:
>>   Package libqt5qml5:amd64 is not configured yet.
>>
>> dpkg: error processing package qml-module-org-kde-runnermodel (--install):
>>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>>  qml-module-org-kde-runnermodel
>>
>> At this point since it can't be connected to a network, I think it's
>> not fixable. Perhaps when I return from Brno I can burn an ISO onto a
>> thumbdrive and do a fresh install.
>>
>> Oh well, thanks for trying!
>
> You really should just do a new install TBH. All of this is
> transitional hickupery from older utopic stuff to newer utopic stuff.
>
> HS

I suppose, but it means a failure. Everyone *should* be able to
upgrade, right? I knew that this was pre-alpha, and am using a box I
don't care about, as a test.

Giving up means the test is a failure.

Valorie