iso content review #2 report
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Sat Mar 1 02:51:56 UTC 2014
On Friday, February 28, 2014 15:25:07 Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Michał Zając
> <michal.zajac+kubuntu-devel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can't we get rid of Calligra for now? No matter how I look at it, it's
> > still not a fully useable replacement for LO.
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Rohan Garg <rohangarg at kubuntu.org> wrote:
> >> > - ubufox is dragging in aptdaemon :S
> >> Ubufox being dragged in because of Firefox , I've filed a bug here 
> >> which has received no attention from the package maintainers :(
> >> As a matter of fact, ubufox is currently broken on ubuntu as well, apt
> >> integration doesn't work, flash install integration doesn't work, etc
> >> etc
> >> > - calligra drags in marble
> >> > ^ on that note, having calligra and LO on the ISO is a gigantic waste
> >> > of
> >> > space
> >> Why do we have both? o_o
> >> Cheers
> >> Rohan Garg
> >>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1274605
> How about we remove Calligra from the ISO this time around, and
> re-evaluate for 14.10? Ideally I'd love to see us use the KDE
> offerings, but it has to be fully usable at least for home use.
How did it all get there anyway?
I thought it was just supposed to be krita (which is a good idea, IMO).
More information about the kubuntu-devel