Final thoughts/votes on Kubuntu Policy

Harald Sitter apachelogger at ubuntu.com
Tue Aug 5 19:36:24 UTC 2014


On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 05, 2014 19:55:07 Harald Sitter wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com>
> wrote:
>> > I, for one,
>> > think the notion that we won't apply known fixes because upstream is non-
>> > responsive is silly.  I don't intend to be bound by it.
>>
>> Where does the fix come from then?
>
> Could be defective Python code I figured out by myself (for reference, this
> exact scenario is why we had an even sort of working displayconfig in hardy -
> if this policy had been in effect, it would have had to be removed and not
> replaced since there was no replacement available).

so why did you not pick up maintainership?

HS



More information about the kubuntu-devel mailing list