Trusty Merges

[Scott Kitterman]

Rohan Garg <rohangarg at kubuntu.org> wrote:
>Sounds sensible to me as well.
>
>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Michał Zając
><michal.zajac+kubuntu-devel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Jonathan Riddell <jr at jriddell.org>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We merged all the KDE SC and other Kubuntu packages last cycle so
>it's
>>> up to date with Debian at KDE SC 4.10.2.  4.11.2 is in Debian
>>> experimental so we have the option of merging again to get the
>latest
>>> packaging but my thinking just now is it won't give us any great
>gain
>>> but will cost lots of time and possibly some pain if we (usually I)
>>> drop changes accidently.  So I'm thinking we only merge on a
>>> case-by-case basis this cycle and do a full merge next time after
>the
>>> LTS.  Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> --
>>> kubuntu-devel mailing list
>>> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> kubuntu-devel mailing list
>> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>>
>
>-- 
>kubuntu-devel mailing list
>kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

I don't like it. Until we know what the changes are, there is no knowing what the benefit would be. Maybe we can get a one off MoM run against experimental so it's not much work. 

Scott K