UDS changes

[Scott Kitterman]

On Sunday, March 03, 2013 09:18:57 PM Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com>wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 03, 2013 09:01:55 PM Philip Muskovac wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 February 2013 18:17:12 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/02/26/ubuntu-developer-summits-now-online-an
> > 
> > > > d-> every-three-months/
> > > > 
> > > > To help transparency (and Canonical's balance sheet?) UDS is moving to
> > 
> > an
> > 
> > > > online only event and the next one is rescheduled for..next week.
> > > > 
> > > > It's feature freeze next week so a good time to review where we are in
> > > > the cycle so maybe we can try this idea out a bit.  Anyone got
> > > > sessions we should have?
> > > > 
> > > > Jonathan
> > > 
> > > So, did we have anything we wanted to talk about during UDS now? We kind
> > 
> > of
> > 
> > > already discussed our standpoint on RR on ubuntu-devel and IRC without
> > > really reaching a conclusion as canonical left too many technical
> > 
> > questions
> > 
> > > unclear. (Not to mention not defining a user base).
> > > 
> > > As we've been playing around with mumble a bit, we could just meet up to
> > > give that a test run. But if yes, when?
> > > 
> > > Philip
> > 
> > I think it would be useful to have a more structured discussion about what
> > we
> > want to do if this rolling proposal is approved.  Maybe put up a doodle
> > poll
> > for a two hour block this week sometime.  I don't thin it needs to be on
> > the
> > UDS schedule at all.
> 
>  After other rolling discussions would be good. A lot of things depend on a
> more concrete plan/idea of what rolling would be going to be. Otherwise it
> would be mostly discussing things in a 'if' fashion which is less
> productive IMO :)

Yes,  but the time for negotiate for $STUFF we need to operate in the new 
world order is during that discussion, so I don't think it can wait.

Scott K