kwin-4.7.1-0ubuntu2~ppa1 needs testing
apachelogger at ubuntu.com
Tue Sep 13 12:02:01 UTC 2011
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Dan Chen <seven.steps at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2011 11:31 PM, "Clay Weber" <claydoh at midmaine.com> wrote:
>> What sort of things should we be looking for, positive or negative?
> Ditto. I normally have several dozen app/windows open, and the performance
> hitches I noticed before seem resolved. It would be nice to know which
> parameters to test, however.
>From Martin's top secret mail:
> During working for an optimization in 4.8 we noticed that we do deep non-const vector copies where a const
> at() operation was expected. This means that we have in each frame:
> 4x+5xy unneeded copy operations
> (x == number of loaded effects)
> (y == number of windows).
So on a stock kubuntu desktop we have something like 15 effects
activated, additionally say you have a browser, a music player and a
chat window (mind you, plasma is also a window ;)) that means per
frame you get 4*15+5*4=80 copies of effects, if you get 15 frames per
second (which would be mostly enough to perceive the desktop as
responsive) that means 15*80=1200 copies. You probably do not have 15
but >40 frames per second that means 3200 copies. Now I actually
forgot what I wanted to write about...
Ah right, so, if you turn on *all* kwin effects (or at least those
that load on your system) and open as many windows a possible, kwin
should not feel overly sluggish (movement of windows, resizing etc.).
Also all effects that worked with the old package should still work
with the new one.
More information about the kubuntu-devel