Kubuntu Website Appearance

[Tres Finocchiaro]

Are we allowed to borrow artwork from the Ubuntu site (i.e., that laptop
picture?)

I don't think the current site looks bad at all.   I just did a visual
comparison against Debian, Fedora, openSUSE, Mandriva, and its comparable.

Here's a mock-up if we were to borrow artwork from Ubuntu.com:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-jrH3-BRRi1g/TvJZLZM_DzI/AAAAAAAAAoo/nctJpxPwSFU/s1600/ubuntu_blue.png

-Tres

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:59 PM, James Cain <james.cain.25 at gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree. I think it needs overhauled with input from a Marketing
> perspective. If I didn't know (and use) Kubuntu already, the website would
> not convince me to try it, let alone ditch Windows. As the OP said, nothing
> against the site as it is very clean and professional looking. It's just a
> little sparse.
>
> James Cain
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:22 PM, heathmatlock <heathmatlock at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Are users able contribute patches to the website? Kudos to those who
>> have worked on it, but imho, it's bland compared to ubuntu.com. The
>> wiki is starting to get some nice overhauls and has an appearance more
>> similar to the one you would expect the frontpage to have.
>>
>> --
>> Heath Matlock
>> +1 256 274 4225
>>
>> --
>> kubuntu-devel mailing list
>> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> kubuntu-devel mailing list
> kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>
>


-- 
- Tres.Finocchiaro at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20111221/a5e0e205/attachment.html>