bluedevil

[Roderick B. Greening]

+1 here as well. Upstream says to use it, then that's fine by me.

> +1 form me.
> I use bluedevil on a daily basis with my Motorola Milestone. It is working
> and I have not encountered any problems yet.
> 
> Michał
> 
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jonathan Riddell 
<jriddell at ubuntu.com>wrote:
> > We need to decide if we are shipping bluedevil or kbluetooth.  I've
> > tried bluedevil and it seems to successfully send files, browse
> > devices and configure some bits.  I got one crash and some of the
> > strings are unprofessional but I think that's part of the work in
> > progress which should be stabalised in the final release next month.
> > 
> > My preference is for bluedevil, upstream agrees from chatting at
> > Akademy.
> > 
> > Does anyone with more experience of bluetooth than I have an opinion?
> > 
> > (Must say I'm mystified why bluetooth UI developers continue to use
> > the systray as the primary user interface, files should be handled
> > through the file manager and config through system settings.)
> > 
> > Jonathan
> > 
> > --
> > kubuntu-devel mailing list
> > kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
_______________________________________
Roderick B. Greening, B.Sc.
Paradise, NL Canada
E-mail/MSN: roderick.greening at gmail.com 
LP: launchpad.net/~roderick-greening 
Wiki: wiki.ubuntu.com/rgreening 
Blog: roderick-greening.blogspot.com 
Twitter: twitter.com/rgreening
Identica: identi.ca/rgreening

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20100820/05a20e65/attachment.pgp