Screensaver defaults

Harald Sitter apachelogger at
Wed Sep 16 13:17:19 BST 2009

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:15:14 +0200 Harald Sitter <apachelogger at>
> wrote:
>>On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Harald Sitter <apachelogger at>
> wrote:
>>> IMHO we should ship a couple of savers by default (and possibly hook
>>> update-notifier in the KCM, so it recommends installing some other
>>> fancy packages), but stick to no-by-default. The reason for
>>> no-by-default is stated in my bug comment.
>>> Also, we probably ought to test kscreensaver before that, last I
>>> checked it had grave issues with GL savers.
>>JR agrees on not shipping savers by default but thinks hooking
>>update-notifier in the KCM. I am going to move the bug to -workspace
>>for implementation, unless anyone disagrees with that course of
> I think it's fine for Karmic plus one.  It'd be a low priority feature
> change for Karmic and not what we should FFe for.

I didn't say anything about implementing it, did I :P

More information about the kubuntu-devel mailing list