Screensaver defaults

[Scott Kitterman]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:15:14 +0200 Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com> 
wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Harald Sitter <apachelogger at ubuntu.com> 
wrote:
>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/273667
>>
>> IMHO we should ship a couple of savers by default (and possibly hook
>> update-notifier in the KCM, so it recommends installing some other
>> fancy packages), but stick to no-by-default. The reason for
>> no-by-default is stated in my bug comment.
>>
>> Also, we probably ought to test kscreensaver before that, last I
>> checked it had grave issues with GL savers.
>
>JR agrees on not shipping savers by default but thinks hooking
>update-notifier in the KCM. I am going to move the bug to -workspace
>for implementation, unless anyone disagrees with that course of
>action?

I think it's fine for Karmic plus one.  It'd be a low priority feature 
change for Karmic and not what we should FFe for.

Scott K