[kubuntu-devel] Thoughts on Arora
Divan.Santana at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 21:40:52 BST 2009
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 14:58:23 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> I'm still in favour of Arora by default since I think the most
> important usability in a browser is being able to browse websites and
> there are too many important ones now which Konqueror doesn't. I seem
> to be outnumbered though, don't you people read slashdot?
I totally agree on this. What is the point of konqueror if almost
everyone(everyone I know anyway) has to install firefox just so they can browse
the net. They then make it default. No normal users are going to use konqueror
for 80% of the net and open firefox when they hit the important 20% of websites
that don't work(I by the way do this.)
I can't even do internet banking with konqueror. There are so many sites
konqueror doesn't render(and with arora and can do internet banking :)
Ideal would to have a more KDE native web browser but arora is definately
better than konqueror in terms of ubuntu's goal of being linux for human
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20090729/a5b5737a/attachment.pgp
More information about the kubuntu-devel