[kubuntu-devel] Thoughts on Arora

Divan Santana Divan.Santana at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 21:40:52 BST 2009

On Tuesday 28 July 2009 14:58:23 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> I'm still in favour of Arora by default since I think the most
> important usability in a browser is being able to browse websites and
> there are too many important ones now which Konqueror doesn't.  I seem
> to be outnumbered though, don't you people read slashdot?

I totally agree on this. What is the point of konqueror if almost 
everyone(everyone I know anyway) has to install firefox just so they can browse 
the net. They then make it default. No normal users are going to use konqueror 
for 80% of the net and open firefox when they hit the important 20% of websites 
that don't work(I by the way do this.)

I can't even do internet banking with konqueror. There are so many sites 
konqueror doesn't render(and with arora and can do internet banking :)

Ideal would to have a more KDE native web browser but arora is definately 
better than konqueror in terms of ubuntu's goal of being linux for human 

Divan Santana
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20090729/a5b5737a/attachment.pgp 

More information about the kubuntu-devel mailing list