Thoughts on Arora
Roderick B. Greening
roderick.greening at gmail.com
Sun Jul 19 20:09:58 BST 2009
No Ad Block
Flash is just as unstable as it was in Konq
Not KDE integrated
No password integration (KWallet)
MIME type detection broken (webkit issue)
Proxy settings not integrated with desktop
I see no plus or pros for it.
And I could go on... the reason we were considering it was due to a particular
site or two working in it... that didn't in Konq.
So, arora is a no go from me, unless version 0.8 offers some extreme changes.
Roderick B. Greening, B.Sc.
Paradise, NL Canada
E-mail/MSN: roderick.greening at gmail.com
> WHile I understand many of the reasons Arora isnt ready, perhaps we could
> have pro and cons in Haralds style, rather than just +1 on a vague
> statement, so we could make an informed decision?
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Christian Mangold
> <neversfelde at kubuntu.org>wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 19. Juli 2009 18:32:35 schrieb Roderick B. Greening:
> > > FUrther thoughts... arora isn't and won't be ready for prime time use
> > this
> > > release - at least as a default browser. (IMO).
> > +1
> > --
> > neversfelde at jabber.neversfelde.de
> > neversfelde on irc.freenode.net
> > --
> > kubuntu-devel mailing list
> > kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20090719/e59d15d0/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the kubuntu-devel