Thoughts on Arora

[Roderick B. Greening]

No Ad Block
Flash is just as unstable as it was in Konq
Not KDE integrated
No password integration (KWallet)
MIME type detection broken (webkit issue)
Proxy settings not integrated with desktop

I see no plus or pros for it.

And I could go on... the reason we were considering it was due to a particular 
site or two working in it... that didn't in Konq.

So, arora is a no go from me, unless version 0.8 offers some extreme changes.
_______________________________________
Roderick B. Greening, B.Sc.
Paradise, NL Canada
E-mail/MSN: roderick.greening at gmail.com 
LP: launchpad.net/~roderick-greening 
Wiki: wiki.ubuntu.com/rgreening 
Blog: roderick-greening.blogspot.com 
Twitter: twitter.com/rgreening
Identica: identi.ca/rgreening


> WHile I understand many of the reasons Arora isnt ready, perhaps we could
> have pro and cons in Haralds style, rather than just +1 on a vague
> statement, so we could make an informed decision?
>
>
> Jussi
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Christian Mangold
>
> <neversfelde at kubuntu.org>wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 19. Juli 2009 18:32:35 schrieb Roderick B. Greening:
> > > FUrther thoughts... arora isn't and won't be ready for prime time use
> >
> > this
> >
> > > release - at least as a default browser. (IMO).
> >
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > neversfelde at jabber.neversfelde.de
> > neversfelde on irc.freenode.net
> >
> > --
> > kubuntu-devel mailing list
> > kubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/attachments/20090719/e59d15d0/attachment-0001.pgp