[Bug 1244036] Re: Quasselcore should use an Upstart script instead of a sysv initscript

Scott Kitterman ubuntu at kitterman.com
Fri Oct 25 02:31:39 UTC 2013


Looks pretty good, but I got a few comments from a developer that knows
way more about upstart than me:

<stgraber> ScottK: looks to me like he wants "start on filesystem and static-network-up" instead, but the start on condition he's using isn' wrong either. Just because I'm picky, the respawn stanza is usually put before the script section so it's easier to spot.
<stgraber> besides that, it should all work fine assuming quasselcore doesn't fork/daemonize
<stgraber> oh and hardcoding /usr/bin is usually not considered a good thing
<ScottK> So just excec quasselcore?
<ScottK> exec even
<ScottK> stgraber: ^^^
<stgraber> yep
<ScottK> Thanks.

** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to quassel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244036

Title:
  Quasselcore should use an Upstart script instead of a sysv initscript

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1244036/+subscriptions




More information about the kubuntu-bugs mailing list