[Bug 1244036] Re: Quasselcore should use an Upstart script instead of a sysv initscript
Scott Kitterman
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Fri Oct 25 02:31:39 UTC 2013
Looks pretty good, but I got a few comments from a developer that knows
way more about upstart than me:
<stgraber> ScottK: looks to me like he wants "start on filesystem and static-network-up" instead, but the start on condition he's using isn' wrong either. Just because I'm picky, the respawn stanza is usually put before the script section so it's easier to spot.
<stgraber> besides that, it should all work fine assuming quasselcore doesn't fork/daemonize
<stgraber> oh and hardcoding /usr/bin is usually not considered a good thing
<ScottK> So just excec quasselcore?
<ScottK> exec even
<ScottK> stgraber: ^^^
<stgraber> yep
<ScottK> Thanks.
** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to quassel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244036
Title:
Quasselcore should use an Upstart script instead of a sysv initscript
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1244036/+subscriptions
More information about the kubuntu-bugs
mailing list