[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

[Sarazar]

I am very much disappointed by the decision re: amarok1.4 and Amarok 2.
There is one really glaring issue that I find amazing. The lack of a
resonable media device manager with out Amarok1.4.

It seems to be the flavour of the month and a very Microsoft attitude to
release incomplete software in K/Ubuntu. The need to have the bleeding
edge is over taking the need for functionality. KDE4 on Hardy before 80%
of the 3.5 functionality was available. Amarok 2 before the media device
manager is complete.

It is not helping the reputation or the penetration of linux and Ubuntu.
As for the  "Must Be Maintained" policy  I think it need a rethink and
an appropriate balance of functionality versus latest release be struck.
I feel the KDE4 release and inclusion has been a perfect example of why
the policy is flawed.

Just my 2 cents worth. The guys here and at KDE are doing an awesome
job, no doubt about that, just think a little more thought is needed in
the make up of the great Ubuntu products.

Keep up the good work.

-- 
[jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.