[Bug 316889] Re: [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4

[Bogdan Butnaru]

By the way, I consider loss of ratings as a grave loss-of-user-data bug
(they are manually entered). That is very bad even for an alpha release
(though it's the only data I _do_ have backups for...)

Anyway, isn't it usual policy to enter non-backwards-compatible packages
with a different name? I really think this should have been called
amarok2, even if the old package is subsequently purged from the
repositories. It would have at least allowed users to keep the old
amarok without messing around with 'hold's in aptitude.

-- 
[jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu.