[Bug 159338] Re: Re: Heads-up: small xine-lib transition in hardy

[Jaldhar]

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> Emmet Hikory <persia at ubuntu.com> writes:
>
>>> From a quick look at pyxine, the correct dependencies of python-pyxine
>> are not clear, given that one could write either an X or console
>> binding.  The only reverse dependency of python-pyxine is lsongs.  I see
>> two options, and encourage someone more familar with python or xine to
>> select one (or suggest something preferable)
>>
>> A)  Add libxine1-x | libxine1-console | libxine1 (<< 1.1.8-2) to pyxine-xine dependencies
>> B)  Add libxine1-x to lsongs dependencies & nothing to pyxine-xine
>
> My current guess is that we should go with option B. I've CC'ed the
> debian pyxine maintainer in this email.
>
> Jaldhar, what are your plans regarding the pyxine package in Debian?
>

Actually, I am slowly in the process of orphaning lsongs and all its 
dependencies.  I am willing to fix all outstanding bugs first though.

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/

-- 
Re: Heads-up: small xine-lib transition in hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159338
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for amarok in ubuntu.