[Bug 84173] Re: amarok sucks at importing large collections.

paulwilson05 paulwilson05 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 13 14:24:07 UTC 2007


yeah, but 18,000 songs seems to lock it up. I think iTunes is better a
multitasking. It seems like Amarok likes to have its processes fall asleep.
And for some reason it doesn't like files tagged in the more modern version
4 id3. I will say that this current Amarok version is a lot more stable than
the last though! Now I just need a super efficient way of having it sync
with my ipod. Wouldn't it also be nice if instead of queuing what you double
click that it would just play what you d-clicked? I'm also going to have to
call for a less clunky interface. Think small, thin, light. The less chrome
and the more play list the better!

But overall, Amarok is right on track. And the magnatune applet rocks.

On 2/11/07, vete <m3nt0r3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After 10/02/07 update amarok "update" and "scan" doesnt works.  It start
> scanning but stop after 2 or 3 seconds. collection.db on .kde/apps/amarok
> dir is 77kb
> I confirm this bug
>
> i use feisty 64 and sqlite like db backend
>
> --
> amarok sucks at importing large collections.
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/84173
>


-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential information and
is intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission
in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and destroy all
copies of the transmission.

-- 
amarok sucks at importing large collections.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84173




More information about the kubuntu-bugs mailing list