[SRU][N/hwe-7.0-meta][PATCH 0/2] Migrate oem-24.04* to hwe-24.04

[Andrei Gherzan]

On 26/09/09 04:24PM, Kuan-Ying Lee via kernel-team wrote:
> Migrate oem-6.8, 6.11, 6.14, 6.17 to hwe-7.0.
> 
> Kuan-Ying Lee (2):
>   UBUNTU: [Packaging] Migrate oem-24.04{a|b|c|d} to generic-hwe-24.04
>   UBUNTU: [Packaging] Remove dkms migration package
> 
>  debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04  | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04a | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04b | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04d | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 220 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04
>  create mode 100644 debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04a
>  create mode 100644 debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04b
>  create mode 100644 debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04c
>  create mode 100644 debian/control.d/migrate-oem-24.04d

Heya! Thanks for handling this.

I can't see a clear value in splitting the patch when one introduces stanzas
that are immediately deleted by another patch. As I see it, it provides no
bisect value while introducing a risk of an inconsistent intermediate state if
only one patch lands or one is tested without the other.

-- 
Andrei Gherzan
gpg: rsa4096/D4D94F67AD0E9640
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20260911/1f951de8/attachment.sig>