[SRU][J:linux][PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/bpf/64: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations
Andrei Gherzan
andrei.gherzan at canonical.com
Tue Jun 30 17:52:51 UTC 2026
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955011
Adding instructions for ppc64 for
atomic[64]_and
atomic[64]_or
atomic[64]_xor
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini at linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le)
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
(backported from commit 65112709115f48f16d7082bcabf173d08622e69f)
[agherzan: Context adjustment - used b2p[TMP_REG_x] notation consistent
with existing Ubuntu Jammy code instead of upstream's tmp1_reg/tmp2_reg
local variables. Used BPF_SIZE(code) inline instead of separate size
variable.]
Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan at canonical.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 6f4a7bcf53aa..b3729f511ac0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -742,41 +742,42 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
* BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
*/
case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
- if (imm != BPF_ADD) {
- pr_err_ratelimited(
- "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
- code, i);
- return -ENOTSUPP;
- }
-
- /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */
-
- /* Get EA into TMP_REG_1 */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, off));
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
+ /* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], off));
tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4;
/* load value from memory into TMP_REG_2 */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0));
- /* add value from src_reg into this */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg));
- /* store result back */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
- /* we're done if this succeeded */
- PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
- break;
- case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
- if (imm != BPF_ADD) {
+ if (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 0));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, 0));
+
+ switch (imm) {
+ case BPF_ADD:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_AND:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_OR:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_XOR:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg));
+ break;
+ default:
pr_err_ratelimited(
"eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
code, i);
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg, off));
- tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4;
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1], 0));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_2], src_reg));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0, b2p[TMP_REG_1]));
+ /* store result back */
+ if (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(b2p[TMP_REG_2], b2p[TMP_REG_1], dst_reg));
+ /* we're done if this succeeded */
PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
break;
--
2.43.0
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list