crash SRU exception feedback for kernel flavors
Roxana Nicolescu
roxana.nicolescu at canonical.com
Mon Sep 30 09:41:36 UTC 2024
On 26/09/2024 15:32, Heitor Alves de Siqueira wrote:
> Hello kernel-team,
>
> I'm currently working on drafting an SRU exception for the crash tool
> [0]. Considering crash keeps backwards compatibility with older
> versions, the intent would be to ship the latest stable upstream
> version in all Ubuntu releases. This would allow one to work with
> kernel dumps from newer releases, without necessarily upgrading to
> them (e.g. open up kernel dumps from 6.8 in Ubuntu Focal).
>
> My initial intention is to test crash against GA/HWE kernels for all
> stable releases, for x86_64 and arm64 arches. This would come down to
> making sure crash is able to open and parse kernel dumps from these
> versions. I'm now questioning if it'd be necessary to spend additional
> time testing different flavors, like -aws, -azure et al. Considering
> these are essentially derivatives of their "regular" kernel
> counterparts, I wouldn't expect there to be significant differences
> that'd warrant additional testing.
>
> To summarize, my question would be something along the lines of "if we
> ensure crash works against linux-6.8, is there a need to also test
> linux-aws-6.8?". My impression is that given those are the same major
> kernel versions we'd have sufficient coverage with just the regular
> GA/HWE kernels, but I'd like to hear your opinion as well. While there
> are plans to automate these tests eventually and include derivative
> kernels, I'd like to avoid over-committing to a broader scope than
> necessary for now.
>
> Please let me know what you think! I'm also open to any feedback on
> the SRU exception itself, if you have any.
>
> Thanks,
> Heitor
>
> [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CrashUpdates
>
Hi Hector,
I do not think it's necessary to include all derivatives. GA and HWE
kernels should suffice.
Roxana
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list