ACK: [SRU][F][PATCH v2 0/2] CVE-2024-27051
Mehmet Basaran
mehmet.basaran at canonical.com
Wed Sep 11 08:39:46 UTC 2024
Acked-by: Mehmet Basaran <mehmet.basaran at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
Koichiro Den <koichiro.den at canonical.com> writes:
> [Impact]
>
> cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return value
>
> cpufreq_cpu_get may return NULL. To avoid NULL-dereference check it
> and return 0 in case of error.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> [Backport]
>
> The primary fix commit had a compile-time warning issue, which on
> upstream was fixed by later commit fa7bd98f3c8b ("cpufreq:
> brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations").
> Both of them are backported with context adjustments.
>
> [Fix]
>
> Noble: not affected
> Jammy: fixed via stable
> Focal: Backport - cleanly applied with one follow-up fix, see [Backport]
> Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
> Xenial: not affected
> Trusty: not affected
>
> [Test Case]
>
> Compile and boot tested
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> This fix affects Broadcom STB SoCs that use AVS firmware with DFS and
> DVFS support, an issue with this fix potentially would be visible to
> user via a system crash due to null pointer dereference.
>
> [Notes]
>
> v2:
> - Fix commit messages and cover letter (cherry-picked -> backported)
>
>
> Anastasia Belova (1):
> cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return
> value
>
> Portia Stephens (1):
> cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations
>
> drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
> --
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20240911/9de94c44/attachment.sig>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list