NACK: [SRU][F][PATCH 0/3] CVE-2024-38588
Koichiro Den
koichiro.den at canonical.com
Fri Oct 25 13:41:08 UTC 2024
I mistakenly sent an old cover letter. Let me send v2.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 10:31:03PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> [Impact]
>
> ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
> KASAN reports a bug:
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424
> CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2+
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
> print_report+0xcf/0x610
> kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0
> ftrace_location+0x90/0x120
> register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40
> kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example]
> do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0
> do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0
> load_module+0x3082/0x33d0
> init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130
> __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440
> do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
>
> The root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address
> is being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages
> at the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the
> corresponding module is being deleted:
>
> CPU1 | CPU2
> register_kprobes() { | delete_module() {
> check_kprobe_address_safe() { |
> arch_check_ftrace_location() { |
> ftrace_location() { |
> lookup_rec() // USE! | ftrace_release_mod() // Free!
>
> To fix this issue:
> 1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range();
> 2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in
> ftrace_location();
> 3. Call synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages both in
> ftrace_process_locs()/ftrace_release_mod()/ftrace_free_mem().
>
> [Fix]
>
> Noble: fixed via stable
> Jammy: fixed via stable
> Focal: Backport - adjusted contexts due to missing commits, see [Backport]
> Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
> Xenial: fix sent to esm ML
> Trusty: won't fix
>
> [Test Case]
>
> Compile and boot tested
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> The primary fix affects those who use kprobes, especially when creating an
> event which leads to ftrace based optimization. Even though the fix
> itself is unlikely to introduce any regression as it's confined to the sync
> issue, the multiple prerequisite commits for the fix touch ftrace
> infrastructures, thus an issue with those would be visible to the user
> via unpredicted system behavior or a system crash when directly using
> any ftrace features.
>
>
> Artem Savkov (1):
> ftrace: Return the first found result in lookup_rec()
>
> Steven Rostedt (VMware) (1):
> ftrace: Separate out functionality from ftrace_location_range()
>
> Zheng Yejian (1):
> ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
>
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list