NACK: [SRU][F][PATCH 0/3] CVE-2024-38588

Koichiro Den koichiro.den at canonical.com
Fri Oct 25 13:41:08 UTC 2024


I mistakenly sent an old cover letter. Let me send v2.

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 10:31:03PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> [Impact]
> 
> ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
> KASAN reports a bug:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ftrace_location+0x90/0x120
>   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888141d40010 by task insmod/424
>   CPU: 8 PID: 424 Comm: insmod Tainted: G        W          6.9.0-rc2+
>   [...]
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
>    print_report+0xcf/0x610
>    kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0
>    ftrace_location+0x90/0x120
>    register_kprobe+0x14b/0xa40
>    kprobe_init+0x2d/0xff0 [kprobe_example]
>    do_one_initcall+0x8f/0x2d0
>    do_init_module+0x13a/0x3c0
>    load_module+0x3082/0x33d0
>    init_module_from_file+0xd2/0x130
>    __x64_sys_finit_module+0x306/0x440
>    do_syscall_64+0x68/0x140
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79
> 
> The root cause is that, in lookup_rec(), ftrace record of some address
> is being searched in ftrace pages of some module, but those ftrace pages
> at the same time is being freed in ftrace_release_mod() as the
> corresponding module is being deleted:
> 
>            CPU1                       |      CPU2
>   register_kprobes() {                | delete_module() {
>     check_kprobe_address_safe() {     |
>       arch_check_ftrace_location() {  |
>         ftrace_location() {           |
>           lookup_rec() // USE!        |   ftrace_release_mod() // Free!
> 
> To fix this issue:
>   1. Hold rcu lock as accessing ftrace pages in ftrace_location_range();
>   2. Use ftrace_location_range() instead of lookup_rec() in
>      ftrace_location();
>   3. Call synchronize_rcu() before freeing any ftrace pages both in
>      ftrace_process_locs()/ftrace_release_mod()/ftrace_free_mem().
> 
> [Fix]
> 
> Noble:  fixed via stable
> Jammy:  fixed via stable
> Focal:  Backport - adjusted contexts due to missing commits, see [Backport]
> Bionic: fix sent to esm ML
> Xenial: fix sent to esm ML
> Trusty: won't fix
> 
> [Test Case]
> 
> Compile and boot tested
> 
> [Where problems could occur]
> 
> The primary fix affects those who use kprobes, especially when creating an
> event which leads to ftrace based optimization. Even though the fix
> itself is unlikely to introduce any regression as it's confined to the sync
> issue, the multiple prerequisite commits for the fix touch ftrace
> infrastructures, thus an issue with those would be visible to the user
> via unpredicted system behavior or a system crash when directly using
> any ftrace features.
> 
> 
> Artem Savkov (1):
>   ftrace: Return the first found result in lookup_rec()
> 
> Steven Rostedt (VMware) (1):
>   ftrace: Separate out functionality from ftrace_location_range()
> 
> Zheng Yejian (1):
>   ftrace: Fix possible use-after-free issue in ftrace_location()
> 
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 



More information about the kernel-team mailing list