CMT: Re: [SRU][n:linux-gcp/o:linux-gcp][PATCH 1/1] UBUNTU: [Config] Mark sev-guest as built-in

Magali Lemes magali.lemes at canonical.com
Wed Oct 9 12:57:49 UTC 2024


On 08/10/2024 22:51, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/8/24 20:50, Magali Lemes wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 08/10/2024 00:27, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/8/24 03:06, Magali Lemes wrote:
>>>> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083848
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Magali Lemes <magali.lemes at canonical.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   debian.gcp/config/annotations | 5 +++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/debian.gcp/config/annotations 
>>>> b/debian.gcp/config/annotations
>>>> index 01bb2d53b2f6..eca7321041ff 100644
>>>> --- a/debian.gcp/config/annotations
>>>> +++ b/debian.gcp/config/annotations
>>>> @@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ CONFIG_RAID6_PQ_DEFAULT_ALG_BOOL note<'LP:1812728'>
>>>>   CONFIG_RUST policy<{'amd64': 'n', 'arm64': '-'}>
>>>>   CONFIG_RUST note<'TODO: update note'>
>>>> +CONFIG_SEV_GUEST policy<{'amd64': 'y'}>
>>>> +CONFIG_SEV_GUEST                                note<'LP: #2083848'>
>>>> +
>>>> +CONFIG_TSM_REPORTS policy<{'amd64': 'y'}>
>>>> +CONFIG_TSM_REPORTS                              note<'LP: #2083848, 
>>>> selected by CONFIG_SEV_GUEST'>
>>>
>>> Does TSM_REPORTS need to be changed here? If so, would be better to 
>>> mention the option in subject and cover-letter too.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, CONFIG_TSM_REPORTS gets selected whenever we enable 
>> CONFIG_SEV_GUEST. The patch goal is to have the sev-guest module as 
>> built-in and for that to happen we need to set CONFIG_SEV_GUEST=y, 
>> which ends up also "selecting" CONFIG_TSM_REPORTS. Due to that, I'd 
>> argue that the subject is aligned with the patch content, since in 
>> order to have sev-guest built-in we need these two config options to 
>> be set to 'y'.
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot for the explanation!
> 
>> Maybe changing the [Fix] section in the BugLink description to also 
>> mention CONFIG_TSM_REPORTS would be enough? Or would a v2 changing the 
>> cover letter content be needed too?
> 
> Either would be good from my opinion.
> 

I have updated the BugLink description. Thank you for reviewing.


Magali

> Thanks,
> Guoqing



More information about the kernel-team mailing list