ACK: [SRU][J/F][PATCH v2 0/1] CVE-2024-44940

[Guoqing Jiang]

Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang at canonical.com>

On 10/9/24 01:38, Bethany Jamison wrote:
> [Impact]
>
> Drop the WARN_ON_ONCE inn gue_gro_receive if the encapsulated type is
> not known or does not have a GRO handler. Such a packet is easily
> constructed. Syzbot generates them and sets off this warning. Remove
> the warning as it is expected and not actionable.
>
> [Fix]
>
> Noble:	applied via stable team
> Jammy:	Clean cherry-pick from linux-6.1.y
> Focal:	Backport from linux-6.1.y - kept 'goto out_unlock' instead of
> 	'goto out', avoided adding commit
> 	fc1ca3348a74a1afaa7ffebc2b2f2cc149e11278
> Bionic:	pending (4.15.0-230.242)
> Xenial:	pending (4.4.0-260.294)
> Trusty:	not-affected
>
> [Test Case]
>
> Compile and boot tested.
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> This fix affects those who use FOU (Foo-over-UDP), an issue with this
> fix would be visible to the user via continued excessive warnings from
> 'gue_gro_recieve'.
>
> v2: My Jammy patch in v1 was incorrect, I believed that Jammy was missing
>      commit fc1ca3348a74a1afaa7ffebc2b2f2cc149e11278 like Focal, and so I
>      manually backported 'goto out_unlock' instead of using 'goto out'.
>      Additionally, between v1 and v2 the fix commit was applied to Noble
>      via the stable team, so I did not include a patch for Noble in v2.
>
> Willem de Bruijn (1):
>    fou: remove warn in gue_gro_receive on unsupported protocol
>
>   net/ipv4/fou.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>