NACK: [PATCH] UBUNTU: [Config] Enable EXFAT_FS on s390x too

[Alessandro Astone]

On 09/08/2024 17:04, Roxana Nicolescu wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/2024 15:56, Alessandro Astone wrote:
>> BugLink:https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076428
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Astone<alessandro.astone at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   debian.master/config/annotations | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/debian.master/config/annotations b/debian.master/config/annotations
>> index 702fca42e937..693e86c6180e 100644
>> --- a/debian.master/config/annotations
>> +++ b/debian.master/config/annotations
>> @@ -4817,7 +4817,7 @@ CONFIG_EVM_EXTRA_SMACK_XATTRS                   policy<{'amd64': 'y', 'arm64': '
>>   CONFIG_EXAR_WDT                                 policy<{'amd64': 'm'}>
>>   CONFIG_EXCLUSIVE_SYSTEM_RAM                     policy<{'amd64': 'y', 'arm64': 'y', 'armhf': 'y', 'ppc64el': 'y', 'riscv64': 'y', 's390x': 'y'}>
>>   CONFIG_EXFAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET                  policy<{'amd64': '"utf8"', 'arm64': '"utf8"', 'armhf': '"utf8"', 'ppc64el': '"utf8"', 'riscv64': '"utf8"'}>
>> -CONFIG_EXFAT_FS                                 policy<{'amd64': 'm', 'arm64': 'm', 'armhf': 'm', 'ppc64el': 'm', 'riscv64': 'm', 's390x': 'n'}>
>> +CONFIG_EXFAT_FS                                 policy<{'amd64': 'm', 'arm64': 'm', 'armhf': 'm', 'ppc64el': 'm', 'riscv64': 'm', 's390x': 'm'}>
>>   CONFIG_EXPERT                                   policy<{'amd64': 'y', 'arm64': 'y', 'armhf': 'y', 'ppc64el': 'y', 'riscv64': 'y', 's390x': 'y'}>
>>   CONFIG_EXPOLINE                                 policy<{'s390x': 'y'}>
>>   CONFIG_EXPOLINE_AUTO                            policy<{'s390x': 'y'}>
> In which series are you interested in? Both this submission and the 
> buglink should reflect that.
> Check this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/StablePatchFormat.
>
We are targeting Oracular, no SRU is needed.
The wiki doesn't mention what to do for development releases; I assumed 
it would be no prefix :/

> A cover letter and more details in the commit message are required for 
> us to understand why this change is needed.
>
Sorry, will do.
> And specific to the actual patch, add a note with the bugno after, 
> like this
> CONFIG_EXFAT_FS                                 note<'LP: #2076428'>
Mh, I would think that a config being excluded for only one specific 
architecture needs a note, not the other way around?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20240812/9b226b54/attachment.html>