NACK: [Unstable/Noble][PATCH v1 0/2] UBUNTU: SAUCE: pid_namespace: namespacify sysctl kernel.pid_max
Roxana Nicolescu
roxana.nicolescu at canonical.com
Fri Apr 19 14:41:44 UTC 2024
On 18/04/2024 15:33, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> this is a proposal to take this upstream patch series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240222160915.315255-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com/#t
> as a Ubuntu Sauce.
>
> I have a plan to make it in upstream Linux kernel. But we have internal
> requestors in Canonical for this functionallity and I believe
> that it makes sense to take it as Ubuntu Sauce for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn at canonical.com>
>
> Christian Brauner (2):
> pid: allow pid_max to be set per pid namespace
> tests/pid_namespace: add pid_max tests
>
> include/linux/pid.h | 3 -
> include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 10 +-
> kernel/pid.c | 126 +++++-
> kernel/pid_namespace.c | 43 ++-
> kernel/sysctl.c | 9 -
> kernel/trace/pid_list.c | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 -
> .../selftests/pid_namespace/.gitignore | 1 +
> .../testing/selftests/pid_namespace/Makefile | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c | 358 ++++++++++++++++++
> 11 files changed, 522 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c
A buglink would help to understand the reason behind this. I don't
understand why we have to do include this before upstream accepts.
Roxana
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list