ACK: [SRU][B][X][PATCH v2 0/1] Force-pass the passage of time test in
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Feb 21 16:13:53 UTC 2023
On 2/20/23 5:58 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814234
>
> SRU Justification:
>
> [Impact]
>
> * This test can fail selftest on various test hosts in our testing
> infrastructure forcing us to keep hinting releases. This leads to
> maintenance burden for a test that is unreliable as it depends on the
> context of the running host.
>
> [Fix]
>
> * Force-pass the test included by upstream in
> 0b63accf87225b5eb7e52814c374cf02d733d4bb. We have chosen to keep this
> test but to force its result unconditionally successful as opposed to
> reverting the aforementioned commit because:
> 1. it keeps running the test with results and data that we can use in
> the future for any "smarter" way to deal with it - eg. statistical
> approach
> 2. it minimizes the maintenance burden of this patch kept in our
> kernel trees
>
> [Test Plan]
>
> * It was tested in clean VMs.
>
> [Where problems could occur]
>
> * No regression expected and the scope is in this specific selftest.
>
> v2:
> * fix Buglink reference
>
> Andrei Gherzan (1):
> UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftest: rtctest: Force passing unreliable subtest
>
> tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>
--
-----------
Tim Gardner
Canonical, Inc
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list