Request to remove obsolete pending SRUs

[Robie Basak]

On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 10:09:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Historically, we have taken the position on the SRU team that SRUs which are
> still in progress when a release goes EOL are not deleted; the rationale
> being that if the package builds more than one binary, and some user has
> installed one or more of those binaries from -proposed, on balance, it is
> better UX for them to be able to apt install other binaries (from the
> -proposed pocket of an EOL release) than to be given an error about
> unsatisfiable dependencies.

I don't remember this reason, but I think we also concluded that we
might as well leave them there so that the ESM team can pick them up if
they want in the future.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20231211/c26b1e56/attachment.sig>