ACK: [SRU][Bionic/Focal][PATCH 0/2] limit "Dummy wait" to old Intel systems
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Oct 4 14:19:07 UTC 2022
On 10/3/22 21:35, Jeff Lane wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990985
>
> Old, circa 2002 chipsets have a bug: they don't go idle when they are
> supposed to. So, a workaround was added to slow the CPU down and
> ensure that the CPU waits a bit for the chipset to actually go idle.
> This workaround is ancient and has been in place in some form since
> the original kernel ACPI implementation.
>
> But, this workaround is very painful on modern systems. The "inl()"
> can take thousands of cycles (see Link: for some more detailed
> numbers and some fun kernel archaeology).
>
> First and foremost, modern systems should not be using this code.
> Typical Intel systems have not used it in over a decade because it is
> horribly inferior to MWAIT-based idle.
>
> Despite this, people do seem to be tripping over this workaround on
> AMD system today.
>
> Limit the "dummy wait" workaround to Intel systems. Keep Modern AMD
> systems from tripping over the workaround. Remotely modern Intel
> systems use intel_idle instead of this code and will, in practice,
> remain unaffected by the dummy wait.
>
> Small patch cleanly picks to both Bionic and Focal.
>
>
>
> Dave Hansen (1):
> ACPI: processor idle: Practically limit "Dummy wait" workaround to old
> Intel systems
>
> Yin Fengwei (1):
> ACPI: processor_idle: Skip dummy wait if kernel is in guest
>
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>
--
-----------
Tim Gardner
Canonical, Inc
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list