ACK: [SRU][kinetic:linux-azure][PATCH v2] UBUNTU: SAUCE: PCI: hv: Only reuse existing IRTE allocation for Multi-MSI

Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Nov 8 19:24:50 UTC 2022


On 11/8/22 12:16 PM, John Cabaj wrote:
> From: Dexuan Cui <decui at microsoft.com>
> 
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995408
> 
> Jeffrey added Multi-MSI support to the pci-hyperv driver by the 4 patches:
> 08e61e861a0e ("PCI: hv: Fix multi-MSI to allow more than one MSI vector")
> 455880dfe292 ("PCI: hv: Fix hv_arch_irq_unmask() for multi-MSI")
> b4b77778ecc5 ("PCI: hv: Reuse existing IRTE allocation in compose_msi_msg()")
> a2bad844a67b ("PCI: hv: Fix interrupt mapping for multi-MSI")
> 
> It turns out that the third patch (b4b77778ecc5) causes a performance
> regression because all the interrupts now happen on 1 physical CPU (or two
> pCPUs, if one pCPU doesn't have enough vectors). When a guest has many PCI
> devices, it may suffer from soft lockups if the workload is heavy, e.g.,
> see https://lwn.net/ml/linux-kernel/20220804025104.15673-1-decui@microsoft.com/
> 
> Commit b4b77778ecc5 itself is good. The real issue is that the hypercall in
> hv_irq_unmask() -> hv_arch_irq_unmask() ->
> hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT...) only changes the target
> virtual CPU rather than physical CPU; with b4b77778ecc5, the pCPU is
> determined only once in hv_compose_msi_msg() where only vCPU0 is specified;
> consequently the hypervisor only uses 1 target pCPU for all the interrupts.
> 
> Note: before b4b77778ecc5, the pCPU is determined twice, and when the pCPU
> is determinted the second time, the vCPU in the effective affinity mask is
> used (i.e., it isn't always vCPU0), so the hypervisor chooses a different
> pCPU for each interrupt.
> 
> The hypercall will be fixed in future to update the pCPU as well, but
> that will take quite a while, so let's restore the old behavior in
> hv_compose_msi_msg(), i.e., don't reuse the existing IRTE allocation for
> single-MSI and MSI-X; for multi-MSI, we choose the vCPU in a round-robin
> manner for each PCI device, so the interrupts of different devices can
> happen on different pCPUs, though the interrupts of each device happen on
> some single pCPU.
> 
> The hypercall fix may not be backported to all old versions of Hyper-V, so
> we want to have this guest side change for ever (or at least till we're sure
> the old affected versions of Hyper-V are no longer supported).
> 
> Fixes: b4b77778ecc5 ("PCI: hv: Reuse existing IRTE allocation in compose_msi_msg()")
> Co-developed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo at quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo at quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv at quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv at quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui at microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Cabaj <john.cabaj at canonical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index db814f7b93ba..c10548243d65 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ static void hv_pci_compose_compl(void *context, struct pci_response *resp,
>   }
>   
>   static u32 hv_compose_msi_req_v1(
> -	struct pci_create_interrupt *int_pkt, struct cpumask *affinity,
> +	struct pci_create_interrupt *int_pkt,
>   	u32 slot, u8 vector, u8 vector_count)
>   {
>   	int_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_CREATE_INTERRUPT_MESSAGE;
> @@ -1640,18 +1640,39 @@ static int hv_compose_msi_req_get_cpu(struct cpumask *affinity)
>   	return cpumask_first_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask);
>   }
>   
> -static u32 hv_compose_msi_req_v2(
> -	struct pci_create_interrupt2 *int_pkt, struct cpumask *affinity,
> -	u32 slot, u8 vector, u8 vector_count)
> +/*
> + * Make sure the dummy vCPU values for multi-MSI don't all point to vCPU0.
> + */
> +static int hv_compose_multi_msi_req_get_cpu(void)
>   {
> +	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(multi_msi_cpu_lock);
> +
> +	/* -1 means starting with CPU 0 */
> +	static int cpu_next = -1;
> +
> +	unsigned long flags;
>   	int cpu;
>   
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&multi_msi_cpu_lock, flags);
> +
> +	cpu_next = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu_next, cpu_online_mask, nr_cpu_ids,
> +				     false);
> +	cpu = cpu_next;
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&multi_msi_cpu_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return cpu;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 hv_compose_msi_req_v2(
> +	struct pci_create_interrupt2 *int_pkt, int cpu,
> +	u32 slot, u8 vector, u8 vector_count)
> +{
>   	int_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_CREATE_INTERRUPT_MESSAGE2;
>   	int_pkt->wslot.slot = slot;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.vector = vector;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.vector_count = vector_count;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.delivery_mode = DELIVERY_MODE;
> -	cpu = hv_compose_msi_req_get_cpu(affinity);
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.processor_array[0] =
>   		hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu);
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.processor_count = 1;
> @@ -1660,18 +1681,15 @@ static u32 hv_compose_msi_req_v2(
>   }
>   
>   static u32 hv_compose_msi_req_v3(
> -	struct pci_create_interrupt3 *int_pkt, struct cpumask *affinity,
> +	struct pci_create_interrupt3 *int_pkt, int cpu,
>   	u32 slot, u32 vector, u8 vector_count)
>   {
> -	int cpu;
> -
>   	int_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_CREATE_INTERRUPT_MESSAGE3;
>   	int_pkt->wslot.slot = slot;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.vector = vector;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.reserved = 0;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.vector_count = vector_count;
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.delivery_mode = DELIVERY_MODE;
> -	cpu = hv_compose_msi_req_get_cpu(affinity);
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.processor_array[0] =
>   		hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu);
>   	int_pkt->int_desc.processor_count = 1;
> @@ -1710,12 +1728,18 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   			struct pci_create_interrupt3 v3;
>   		} int_pkts;
>   	} __packed ctxt;
> +	bool multi_msi;
>   	u64 trans_id;
>   	u32 size;
>   	int ret;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	msi_desc  = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
> +	multi_msi = !msi_desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_msix &&
> +		    msi_desc->nvec_used > 1;
>   
>   	/* Reuse the previous allocation */
> -	if (data->chip_data) {
> +	if (data->chip_data && multi_msi) {
>   		int_desc = data->chip_data;
>   		msg->address_hi = int_desc->address >> 32;
>   		msg->address_lo = int_desc->address & 0xffffffff;
> @@ -1723,7 +1747,6 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	msi_desc  = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
>   	pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(msi_desc);
>   	dest = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(data);
>   	pbus = pdev->bus;
> @@ -1733,11 +1756,18 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   	if (!hpdev)
>   		goto return_null_message;
>   
> +	/* Free any previous message that might have already been composed. */
> +	if (data->chip_data && !multi_msi) {
> +		int_desc = data->chip_data;
> +		data->chip_data = NULL;
> +		hv_int_desc_free(hpdev, int_desc);
> +	}
> +
>   	int_desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*int_desc), GFP_ATOMIC);
>   	if (!int_desc)
>   		goto drop_reference;
>   
> -	if (!msi_desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_msix && msi_desc->nvec_used > 1) {
> +	if (multi_msi) {
>   		/*
>   		 * If this is not the first MSI of Multi MSI, we already have
>   		 * a mapping.  Can exit early.
> @@ -1762,9 +1792,11 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   		 */
>   		vector = 32;
>   		vector_count = msi_desc->nvec_used;
> +		cpu = hv_compose_multi_msi_req_get_cpu();
>   	} else {
>   		vector = hv_msi_get_int_vector(data);
>   		vector_count = 1;
> +		cpu = hv_compose_msi_req_get_cpu(dest);
>   	}
>   
>   	memset(&ctxt, 0, sizeof(ctxt));
> @@ -1775,7 +1807,6 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   	switch (hbus->protocol_version) {
>   	case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_1:
>   		size = hv_compose_msi_req_v1(&ctxt.int_pkts.v1,
> -					dest,
>   					hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
>   					vector,
>   					vector_count);
> @@ -1784,7 +1815,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   	case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_2:
>   	case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_3:
>   		size = hv_compose_msi_req_v2(&ctxt.int_pkts.v2,
> -					dest,
> +					cpu,
>   					hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
>   					vector,
>   					vector_count);
> @@ -1792,7 +1823,7 @@ static void hv_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>   
>   	case PCI_PROTOCOL_VERSION_1_4:
>   		size = hv_compose_msi_req_v3(&ctxt.int_pkts.v3,
> -					dest,
> +					cpu,
>   					hpdev->desc.win_slot.slot,
>   					vector,
>   					vector_count);
Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>
-- 
-----------
Tim Gardner
Canonical, Inc




More information about the kernel-team mailing list