APPLIED[F/I/J]: [F/I/J][K/Unstable][OEM-5.14/OEM-5.17][PATCHv2 0/2] Remove SAUCE patches from test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh in net of ubuntu_kernel_selftests
luke.nowakowskikrijger at canonical.com
Wed Jun 22 06:16:10 UTC 2022
Applied to focal, impish, jammy linux master-next
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 2:53 AM Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin at canonical.com> wrote:
> test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches
> submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config
> related issue).
> With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should
> remove the SAUCE patches that mark "underlay in a VRF" test failure as
> an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could
> reduce maintenance cost as well.
> Revert the following patches:
> * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in
> non-default VRF an expected failure
> * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail
> Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have
> also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this
> change, it works as expected.
> [Where problems could occur]
> Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
> kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
> our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
> doing the right thing.
> v2: Target update.
> Po-Hsu Lin (2):
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf
> on xfail"
> Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in
> non-default VRF an expected failure"
> tools/testing/selftests/net/test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kernel-team