ACK: [F/I/J][K/Unstable][OEM-5.14/OEM-5.17][PATCHv2 0/2] Remove SAUCE patches from test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh in net of ubuntu_kernel_selftests

[Tim Gardner]

Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>

On 6/1/22 03:53, Po-Hsu Lin wrote:
> [Impact]
> test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches
> submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config
> related issue).
> 
> With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should
> remove the SAUCE patches that mark "underlay in a VRF" test failure as
> an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could
> reduce maintenance cost as well.
> 
> [Fix]
> Revert the following patches:
> * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
> * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail
> 
> [Test]
> Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have
> also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this
> change, it works as expected.
> 
> [Where problems could occur]
> Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
> kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
> our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
> doing the right thing.
> 
> v2: Target update.
> 
> Po-Hsu Lin (2):
>    Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf
>      on xfail"
>    Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in
>      non-default VRF an expected failure"
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/net/test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh | 7 ++-----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
-----------
Tim Gardner
Canonical, Inc