[SRU Bionic 2/4] bpf: add couple of test cases for div/mod by zero

[Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo]

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934414

Add couple of missing test cases for eBPF div/mod by zero to the
new test_verifier prog runtime feature. Also one for an empty prog
and only exit.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast at kernel.org>
(backported from commit 87c1793b1b7f34915e9e64cdb503efb281c769a7)
[cascardo: changed error message for empty prog]
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo at canonical.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index bee0c8caa376..7f28618de35e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -102,6 +102,93 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.result = ACCEPT,
 		.retval = -3,
 	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV32 by 0, zero check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"DIV64 by 0, zero check",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD32 by 0, zero check 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"MOD64 by 0, zero check",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"empty prog",
+		.insns = {
+		},
+		.errstr = "jump out of range from insn 0 to 1",
+		.result = REJECT,
+	},
+	{
+		"only exit insn",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "R0 !read_ok",
+		.result = REJECT,
+	},
 	{
 		"unreachable",
 		.insns = {
-- 
2.32.0