NAK Re: [PATCH 0/1][U] Support Intel CNVi 9462/AX201/AX211 on ADL

[Timo Aaltonen]

On 27.8.2021 11.49, You-Sheng Yang wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933938
> 
> [Impact]
> 
> Intel CNVi moves key elements of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Technology into
> Intel processors. As a result, their driver may have to be revised
> across processor generations.
> 
> [Fix]
> 
> This depends on a few changes set to address all issues on supporting:
> * PCI [8086:7af0] Subsystem [8086:4090] (AX211)
>    * WiFi: iwlwifi-so-a0-gf-a0-*
>    * BT: intel/ibt-1040-0041.* (ADL-S)
>    * BT: intel/ibt-0040-0041.* (ADL-P)
> * PCI [8086:7af0] Subsystem [8086:4070] (AX201)
>    * WiFi: iwlwifi-so-a0-hr-b0-*
>    * BT: intel/ibt-1040-4150.*
> * PCI [8086:7af0] Subsystem [8086:0aaa] (9462)
>    * WiFi: iwlwifi-so-a0-jf-b0-*
>    * BT: intel/ibt-1040-1020.*
> 
> AX201 wifi firmware for ADL platforms will be available with FW
> API >= 64, so a patchset "iwlwifi: bump FW API to 64 for AX devices"
> will be required. Depending fixes are pulled as well.
> 
> For reset of them, 3 additional commits for iwlwifi, also in mainline
> now, are required.
> 
> The last patch for 9462 Bluetooth is still under review at the time of
> writing. This is the only patch that is not yet in unstable.
> 
> [Test Case]
> 
> Install these CRF on ADL-S/ADL-P platforms and check if WiFi/Bluetooth
> is working.
> 
> [Where problems could occur]
> 
> While this is a new generation, we may have common issues like power
> consumption, network throughput, suspend/resume issues.
> 
> [Other Info]
> 
> Intel is to release the corresponding firmware blobs next week. These
> are verified with pre-released firmware.
> 
> Kiran K (1):
>    UBUNTU: SAUCE: Bluetooth: btintel: Support Digital(N) + RF(N-1)
>      combination
> 
>   drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h |  10 +++
>   drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c   | 149 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   3 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 

I didn't test on unstable, but doesn't apply on oem-5.14 so I guess it 
won't apply on unstable either.. please rebase and target oem-5.14 too, 
thanks!


-- 
t