ACK: [SRU Bionic 0/4] BPF tests on i386
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Mon Nov 1 17:32:39 UTC 2021
Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>
LGTM, only affects testing.
On 10/29/21 2:36 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788578
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934414
>
> These two bugs are related to BPF tests on i386.
>
> The first one requires a change on how some narrow/unaligned context access
> is allowed. It could lead to BPF programs causing processor exceptions on
> some architectures, though it shouldn't.
>
> The second one only changes the tests. I verified at least i386 and amd64,
> and they are all fine there.
>
> The second bug required a lot of backport, because we didn't want to
> required kernel BPF verifier changes that could introduce regressions, or
> worse, potential vulnerabilities because of incomplete backports.
>
> Those would be:
>
> commit cc8b0b92a1699bc32f7fec71daa2bfc90de43a4d "bpf: introduce function
> calls (function boundaries)", which would open a big can of worms we don't
> want to do.
>
> commit 5e581dad4fec0e6d062740dc35b8dc248b39d224 "bpf: make unknown opcode
> handling more robust". Though it might add more robustness, it changes the
> table in the interpreter, so I decided not to backport it now, and fixup
> the error messages in test_verifier, instead.
>
> Cascardo.
>
>
> Alexei Starovoitov (1):
> selftests/bpf: make test_verifier run most programs
>
> Daniel Borkmann (3):
> bpf: add couple of test cases for div/mod by zero
> bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others
> bpf: fix context access in tracing progs on 32 bit archs
>
> include/linux/filter.h | 30 +-
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +-
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 +-
> lib/test_bpf.c | 8 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 358 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
--
-----------
Tim Gardner
Canonical, Inc
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list