[PATCH 2/2] x86, sched: Fix the AMD CPPC maximum performance value on certain AMD Ryzen generations

[Kai-Heng Feng]

From: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928482

Some AMD Ryzen generations has different calculation method on maximum
performance. 255 is not for all ASICs, some specific generations should use 166
as the maximum performance. Otherwise, it will report incorrect frequency value
like below:

  ~ → lscpu | grep MHz
  CPU MHz:                         3400.000
  CPU max MHz:                     7228.3198
  CPU min MHz:                     2200.0000

[ mingo: Tidied up whitespace use. ]
[ Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras.ru>: fix 225 -> 255 typo. ]

Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems")
Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies")
Reported-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham at gmail.com>
Fixed-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras.ru>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham at gmail.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210425073451.2557394-1-ray.huang@amd.com
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211791
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3743d55b289c203d8f77b7cd47c24926b9d186ae)
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng at canonical.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c        | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c        |  2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c   |  6 +++++-
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 50d02db72317..019978fb8fa8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -806,9 +806,11 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow);
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
 extern u16 amd_get_nb_id(int cpu);
 extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void);
+extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void);
 #else
 static inline u16 amd_get_nb_id(int cpu)		{ return 0; }
 static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void)	{ return 0; }
+static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void)		{ return 0; }
 #endif
 
 static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index a2551b10780c..ee8271cfffa1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -1197,3 +1197,19 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr)
 		break;
 	}
 }
+
+u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void)
+{
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
+
+	if (c->x86 == 0x17 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) ||
+			       (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)))
+		return 166;
+
+	if (c->x86 == 0x19 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) ||
+			       (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70)))
+		return 166;
+
+	return 255;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index dc7534d01f72..78c5c9293c9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static bool amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void)
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+	highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf();
 	nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
 
 	if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index d1bbc16fba4b..7e7450453714 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -646,7 +646,11 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
+		highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf();
+	else
+		highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+
 	nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
 
 	if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {
-- 
2.31.1