NAK[F]: [SRU][F/E/B/X][PATCH v2 0/2] ipsec interfaces: fix sending with bpf_redirect() / AF_PACKET sockets
Seth Forshee
seth.forshee at canonical.com
Wed Feb 19 16:12:44 UTC 2020
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:07:27AM -0700, Kelsey Skunberg wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860969
>
> SRU Justification:
>
> [Impact]
> Packets sent to a vti[6]/xfrm interface via bpf_redirect() or via an AF_PACKET
> socket are dropped (no carrier).
>
> The bug exists since the beginning of each driver.
>
> [Fix]
> This has been fixed in v5.5 by the following upstream commits
> - 95224166a903 ("vti[6]: fix packet tx through bpf_redirect()")
> - f042365dbffe ("xfrm interface: fix packet tx through bpf_redirect()")
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=95224166a903
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f042365dbffe
>
> Backport the requested patches to Eoan (5.3), Bionic (4.15) and
> Xenial (4.4).
>
> Patches have already been applied to 5.4 focal tree through upstream stable
> updates.
>
> [Testcase]
> Can be reproduced and tested with an AF_PACKET socket and python script which
> is included in both mentioned patches.
>
> [Risk of Regression]
> This patch affects only the cases described above (when no dst is attached
> to the skb), thus the risk should be low.
Focal already has these patches, so NAK there.
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list