"linux" apport package hook

[Seth Forshee]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:49:47AM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 01:25:59AM +0800, You-Sheng Yang wrote:
> > How about let each kernel package install their own symbolic link? That
> > would probably take many duplicated works for each variant (perhaps just
> > generate it from a common script), but it's a more clean and formal way to
> > maintain package hooks, and then apport source package can then be freed
> > from maintaining an endless list that is really not related to itself.
> 
> Many source packages do provide their own package hooks and I don't
> recall why apport actually installs the one for the kernel. I think this
> would be a better approach overall but in the interim plan on uploading
> apport with the additional symlinks. Is there anything wrong with the
> ones I've created?

The ones you have look fine. We'll look into adding our own hooks as
well.

Thanks,
Seth