[PATCH 032/379][SRU][OEM-5.6] net: qrtr: Fix FIXME related to qrtr_ns_init()

[You-Sheng Yang]

From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879633

The 2 second delay before calling qrtr_ns_init() meant that the remote
processors would register as endpoints in qrtr and the say_hello() call
would therefor broadcast the outgoing HELLO to them. With the HELLO
handshake corrected this delay is no longer needed.

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam at linaro.org>
Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit 71046abfffe9d34ae90c82cf9c8e44355c2e114c)
Signed-off-by: You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang at canonical.com>
---
 net/qrtr/ns.c   |  2 +-
 net/qrtr/qrtr.c | 10 +---------
 net/qrtr/qrtr.h |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c
index 61a58a35cc91..e7d0fe3f4330 100644
--- a/net/qrtr/ns.c
+++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static void qrtr_ns_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
 	queue_work(qrtr_ns.workqueue, &qrtr_ns.work);
 }
 
-void qrtr_ns_init(struct work_struct *work)
+void qrtr_ns_init(void)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_qrtr sq;
 	int ret;
diff --git a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
index 1c2d70d4a47b..2d8d6131bc5f 100644
--- a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
+++ b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/termios.h>	/* For TIOCINQ/OUTQ */
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
-#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include <net/sock.h>
 
@@ -110,8 +109,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(qrtr_node_lock);
 static DEFINE_IDR(qrtr_ports);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(qrtr_port_lock);
 
-static struct delayed_work qrtr_ns_work;
-
 /**
  * struct qrtr_node - endpoint node
  * @ep_lock: lock for endpoint management and callbacks
@@ -1264,11 +1261,7 @@ static int __init qrtr_proto_init(void)
 		return rc;
 	}
 
-	/* FIXME: Currently, this 2s delay is required to catch the NEW_SERVER
-	 * messages from routers. But the fix could be somewhere else.
-	 */
-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&qrtr_ns_work, qrtr_ns_init);
-	schedule_delayed_work(&qrtr_ns_work, msecs_to_jiffies(2000));
+	qrtr_ns_init();
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -1276,7 +1269,6 @@ postcore_initcall(qrtr_proto_init);
 
 static void __exit qrtr_proto_fini(void)
 {
-	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&qrtr_ns_work);
 	qrtr_ns_remove();
 	sock_unregister(qrtr_family.family);
 	proto_unregister(&qrtr_proto);
diff --git a/net/qrtr/qrtr.h b/net/qrtr/qrtr.h
index 53a237a28971..dc2b67f17927 100644
--- a/net/qrtr/qrtr.h
+++ b/net/qrtr/qrtr.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ void qrtr_endpoint_unregister(struct qrtr_endpoint *ep);
 
 int qrtr_endpoint_post(struct qrtr_endpoint *ep, const void *data, size_t len);
 
-void qrtr_ns_init(struct work_struct *work);
+void qrtr_ns_init(void);
 
 void qrtr_ns_remove(void);
 
-- 
2.29.2