[PATCH] UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests/seccomp: allow clock_nanosleep instead of nanosleep

Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo cascardo at canonical.com
Thu Apr 9 09:32:43 UTC 2020


On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:03:53AM +0800, Po-Hsu Lin wrote:
> Hello Thadeu,
> 
> What is the targeted series for this patch?
> 
> Thanks

Sorry, I missed that. It's Focal and Unstable.

> 
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:59 AM Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> <cascardo at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > glibc 2.31 calls clock_nanosleep when its nanosleep function is used. So
> > the restart_syscall fails after that. In order to deal with it, we trace
> > clock_nanosleep and nanosleep. Then we check for either.
> >
> > This works just fine on systems with both glibc 2.30 and glibc 2.31,
> > whereas it failed before on a system with glibc 2.31.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo at canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 14 ++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> > index ee1b727ede04..fa2b87aa0bda 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> > @@ -2749,12 +2749,13 @@ TEST(syscall_restart)
> >                          offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
> >
> >  #ifdef __NR_sigreturn
> > -               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_sigreturn, 6, 0),
> > +               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_sigreturn, 7, 0),
> >  #endif
> > -               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_read, 5, 0),
> > -               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_exit, 4, 0),
> > -               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_rt_sigreturn, 3, 0),
> > -               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_nanosleep, 4, 0),
> > +               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_read, 6, 0),
> > +               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_exit, 5, 0),
> > +               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_rt_sigreturn, 4, 0),
> > +               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_nanosleep, 5, 0),
> > +               BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_clock_nanosleep, 4, 0),
> >                 BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_restart_syscall, 4, 0),
> >
> >                 /* Allow __NR_write for easy logging. */
> > @@ -2841,7 +2842,8 @@ TEST(syscall_restart)
> >         ASSERT_EQ(PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP, (status >> 16));
> >         ASSERT_EQ(0, ptrace(PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG, child_pid, NULL, &msg));
> >         ASSERT_EQ(0x100, msg);
> > -       EXPECT_EQ(__NR_nanosleep, get_syscall(_metadata, child_pid));
> > +       ret = get_syscall(_metadata, child_pid);
> > +       EXPECT_TRUE(ret == __NR_nanosleep || ret == __NR_clock_nanosleep);
> >
> >         /* Might as well check siginfo for sanity while we're here. */
> >         ASSERT_EQ(0, ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO, child_pid, NULL, &info));
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > kernel-team mailing list
> > kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team



More information about the kernel-team mailing list