ACK / APPLIED[F/Unstable]: [X][B][D][E][F][SRU][PATCH 0/1] Fix for add_key05 test in LTP syscalls test

[Seth Forshee]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:12:46PM +0800, Po-Hsu Lin wrote:
> == SRU Justification ==
> add_key05 test in LTP syscalls test is a regression test for the following
> commits:
>  * a08bf91ce28e ("KEYS: allow reaching the keys quotas exactly")
>  * 2e356101e72a ("KEYS: reaching the keys quotas correctly")
> 
> This test case will fail with the following sub-test, which is for testing
> maximum length passed to the add_key syscall:
>  add_key05.c:133: FAIL: add_key(test_max) failed unexpectedly: EDQUOT (122)
> 
> == Fix ==
>  * 2e356101e72a ("KEYS: reaching the keys quotas correctly")
> 
> This patch can be cherry-picked into X/B/D/E/F.
> 
> == Test ==
> Test kernels could be found here:
> https://people.canonical.com/~phlin/kernel/lp-1869644-add_key05/
> 
> The test will pass with the patched kernel:
>   add_key05.c:128: PASS: add_key(test_max) succeeded as expected
> 
> == Regression Potential ==
> Low, small correction for length limit and with positive test results.

Acked-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com>

Applied to focal/master-next and unstable/master, thanks!