[SRU][B][PATCH 5/7] net_sched: fix a memory leak in cls_tcindex
Andrea Righi
andrea.righi at canonical.com
Wed May 15 13:02:39 UTC 2019
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong at gmail.com>
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825942
When tcindex_destroy() destroys all the filter results in
the perfect hash table, it invokes the walker to delete
each of them. However, results with class==0 are skipped
in either tcindex_walk() or tcindex_delete(), which causes
a memory leak reported by kmemleak.
This patch fixes it by skipping the walker and directly
deleting these filter results so we don't miss any filter
result.
As a result of this change, we have to initialize exts->net
properly in tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(). For net-next, we
need to consider whether we should initialize ->net in
tcf_exts_init() instead, before that just directly test
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=y.
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs at mojatatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
(backported from commit 033b228e7f26b29ae37f8bfa1bc6b209a5365e9f)
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi at canonical.com>
---
net/sched/cls_tcindex.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
index 5d89ca5c76cd..13164d8d055a 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
@@ -220,14 +220,6 @@ static int tcindex_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last)
return 0;
}
-static int tcindex_destroy_element(struct tcf_proto *tp,
- void *arg, struct tcf_walker *walker)
-{
- bool last;
-
- return tcindex_delete(tp, arg, &last);
-}
-
static void tcindex_destroy_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct tcindex_data *p = container_of(to_rcu_work(work),
@@ -278,7 +270,7 @@ static void tcindex_free_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
kfree(cp->perfect);
}
-static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
+static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct net *net, struct tcindex_data *cp)
{
int i, err = 0;
@@ -292,6 +284,9 @@ static int tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(struct tcindex_data *cp)
TCA_TCINDEX_ACT, TCA_TCINDEX_POLICE);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
+ cp->perfect[i].exts.net = net;
+#endif
}
return 0;
@@ -340,7 +335,7 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long base,
if (p->perfect) {
int i;
- if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(cp) < 0)
+ if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(net, cp) < 0)
goto errout;
for (i = 0; i < cp->hash; i++)
cp->perfect[i].res = p->perfect[i].res;
@@ -409,7 +404,7 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, unsigned long base,
err = -ENOMEM;
if (!cp->perfect && !cp->h) {
if (valid_perfect_hash(cp)) {
- if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(cp) < 0)
+ if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(net, cp) < 0)
goto errout_alloc;
balloc = 1;
} else {
@@ -562,13 +557,32 @@ static void tcindex_walk(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tcf_walker *walker)
static void tcindex_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)
{
struct tcindex_data *p = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
- struct tcf_walker walker;
+ int i;
pr_debug("tcindex_destroy(tp %p),p %p\n", tp, p);
- walker.count = 0;
- walker.skip = 0;
- walker.fn = tcindex_destroy_element;
- tcindex_walk(tp, &walker);
+
+ if (p->perfect) {
+ for (i = 0; i < p->hash; i++) {
+ struct tcindex_filter_result *r = p->perfect + i;
+
+ tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &r->res);
+ if (tcf_exts_get_net(&r->exts))
+ tcf_queue_work(&r->rwork,
+ tcindex_destroy_rexts_work);
+ else
+ __tcindex_destroy_rexts(r);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; p->h && i < p->hash; i++) {
+ struct tcindex_filter *f, *next;
+ bool last;
+
+ for (f = rtnl_dereference(p->h[i]); f; f = next) {
+ next = rtnl_dereference(f->next);
+ tcindex_delete(tp, &f->result, &last);
+ }
+ }
tcf_queue_work(&p->rwork, tcindex_destroy_work);
}
--
2.17.1
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list