ACK/Cmnt: [PATCH][Unstable][SRU Disco] UBUNTU: SAUCE: ixgbe: Avoid NULL pointer dereference with VF on non-IPsec hw
Andrea Righi
andrea.righi at canonical.com
Wed Jun 26 15:37:50 UTC 2019
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:33:48AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:37 AM Andrea Righi <andrea.righi at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:59:28AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829652
> > >
> > > An ipsec structure will not be allocated if the hardware does not support
> > > offload. Fixes the following Oops:
> > >
> > > [ 191.045452] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.054232] Mem abort info:
> > > [ 191.057014] ESR = 0x96000004
> > > [ 191.060057] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > > [ 191.065963] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > > [ 191.069004] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > > [ 191.072132] Data abort info:
> > > [ 191.074999] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
> > > [ 191.078822] CM = 0, WnR = 0
> > > [ 191.081780] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 0000000043d9e467
> > > [ 191.088382] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.093252] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
> > > [ 191.098119] Modules linked in: vhost_net vhost tap vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp bridge stp llc ebtable_filter devlink ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter bpfilter ipmi_ssif nls_iso8859_1 input_leds joydev ipmi_si hns_roce_hw_v2 ipmi_devintf hns_roce ipmi_msghandler cppc_cpufreq sch_fq_codel ib_iser rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ip_tables x_tables autofs4 ses enclosure btrfs zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor hid_generic usbhid hid raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear ixgbevf hibmc_drm ttm
> > > [ 191.168607] drm_kms_helper aes_ce_blk aes_ce_cipher syscopyarea crct10dif_ce sysfillrect ghash_ce qla2xxx sysimgblt sha2_ce sha256_arm64 hisi_sas_v3_hw fb_sys_fops sha1_ce uas nvme_fc mpt3sas ixgbe drm hisi_sas_main nvme_fabrics usb_storage hclge scsi_transport_fc ahci libsas hnae3 raid_class libahci xfrm_algo scsi_transport_sas mdio aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_arm64
> > > [ 191.202952] CPU: 94 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/94 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc1+ #11
> > > [ 191.209553] Hardware name: Huawei D06 /D06, BIOS Hisilicon D06 UEFI RC0 - V1.20.01 04/26/2019
> > > [ 191.218064] pstate: 20400089 (nzCv daIf +PAN -UAO)
> > > [ 191.222873] pc : ixgbe_ipsec_vf_clear+0x60/0xd0 [ixgbe]
> > > [ 191.228093] lr : ixgbe_msg_task+0x2d0/0x1088 [ixgbe]
> > > [ 191.233044] sp : ffff000009b3bcd0
> > > [ 191.236346] x29: ffff000009b3bcd0 x28: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.241647] x27: ffff000009628000 x26: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.246946] x25: ffff803f652d7600 x24: 0000000000000004
> > > [ 191.252246] x23: ffff803f6a718900 x22: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.257546] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.262845] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.268144] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.273443] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000100000026
> > > [ 191.278742] x13: 0000000100000025 x12: ffff8a5f7fbe0df0
> > > [ 191.284042] x11: 000000010000000b x10: 0000000000000040
> > > [ 191.289341] x9 : 0000000000001100 x8 : ffff803f6a824fd8
> > > [ 191.294640] x7 : ffff803f6a825098 x6 : 0000000000000001
> > > [ 191.299939] x5 : ffff000000f0ffc0 x4 : 0000000000000000
> > > [ 191.305238] x3 : ffff000028c00000 x2 : ffff803f652d7600
> > > [ 191.310538] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff000000f205f0
> > > [ 191.315838] Process swapper/94 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x00000000addfed5a)
> > > [ 191.322613] Call trace:
> > > [ 191.325055] ixgbe_ipsec_vf_clear+0x60/0xd0 [ixgbe]
> > > [ 191.329927] ixgbe_msg_task+0x2d0/0x1088 [ixgbe]
> > > [ 191.334536] ixgbe_msix_other+0x274/0x330 [ixgbe]
> > > [ 191.339233] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x270
> > > [ 191.343924] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x40/0x98
> > > [ 191.348355] handle_irq_event+0x50/0xa8
> > > [ 191.352180] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xbc/0x148
> > > [ 191.356263] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
> > > [ 191.360259] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
> > > [ 191.364343] gic_handle_irq+0x84/0x180
> > > [ 191.368079] el1_irq+0xe8/0x180
> > > [ 191.371208] arch_cpu_idle+0x30/0x1a8
> > > [ 191.374860] do_idle+0x1dc/0x2a0
> > > [ 191.378077] cpu_startup_entry+0x2c/0x30
> > > [ 191.381988] secondary_start_kernel+0x150/0x1e0
> > > [ 191.386506] Code: 6b15003f 54000320 f1404a9f 54000060 (79400260)
> > >
> > > Fixes: eda0333ac2930 ("ixgbe: add VF IPsec management")
> > > Signed-off-by: dann frazier <dann.frazier at canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
> > > index ff85ce5791a36..31629fc7e820f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
> > > @@ -842,6 +842,9 @@ void ixgbe_ipsec_vf_clear(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, u32 vf)
> > > struct ixgbe_ipsec *ipsec = adapter->ipsec;
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > + if (!ipsec)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> >
> > I was wondering if we should check adapter->flags2 instead, like this:
> >
> > if (!(adapter->flags2 & IXGBE_FLAG2_IPSEC_ENABLED))
> > return;
> >
> > Since in other places we're always checking this flag to determine if
> > ipsec is enabled or not.
> >
> > But also checking adapter->ipsec seems a sane fix to me, therefore:
> >
> > Acked-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi at canonical.com>
>
> Thanks. Yeah, either fix would be fine for me. This one is now queued
> in the maintainer's tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/commit/?h=dev-queue&id=b4a3a35f72fbec9088cf8449e2b828008ad036bd
>
> -dann
Alright, if it's already queued in the maintainer's tree let's stick
with this fix. :)
Thanks,
-Andrea
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list