[SRU B][C][PATCH 1/1] UBUNTU: SAUCE: cachefiles: Page leaking in cachefiles_read_backing_file while vmscan is active

[Daniel Axtens]

From: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri at gmail.com>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793430

[Description]
In a heavily loaded system where the system pagecache is nearing
memory limits and fscache is enabled, pages can be leaked by fscache
while trying read pages from cachefiles backend.  This can happen
because two applications can be reading same page from a single mount,
two threads can be trying to read the backing page at same time. This
results in one of the thread finding that a page for the backing file
or netfs file is already in the radix tree. During the error handling
cachefiles does not cleanup the reference on backing page, leading to
page leak.

[Fix]
The fix is straightforward, to decrement the reference when error is
encounterd.

[Testing]
I have tested the fix using following method for 12+ hrs.

1) mkdir -p /mnt/nfs ; mount -o vers=3,fsc <server_ip>:/export /mnt/nfs
2) create 10000 files of 2.8MB in a NFS mount.
3) start a thread to simulate heavy VM presssure
   (while true ; do echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ; sleep 1 ; done)&
4) start multiple parallel reader for data set at same time
   find /mnt/nfs -type f | xargs -P 80 cat > /dev/null &
   find /mnt/nfs -type f | xargs -P 80 cat > /dev/null &
   find /mnt/nfs -type f | xargs -P 80 cat > /dev/null &
   ..
   ..
   find /mnt/nfs -type f | xargs -P 80 cat > /dev/null &
   find /mnt/nfs -type f | xargs -P 80 cat > /dev/null &
5) finally check using cat /proc/fs/fscache/stats | grep -i pages ;
   free -h , cat /proc/meminfo and page-types -r -b lru
   to ensure all pages are freed.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja at axtens.net>
Signed-off-by: Shantanu Goel <sgoel01 at yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri at gmail.com>
[dja: forward ported to current upstream]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja at axtens.net>
[applied from
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs/2018-August/msg00007.html
 This is v2 of the patch. It has sat on the list for weeks without
 any response or forward progress. v1 was first posted in 2014 and
 was reposted this August.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <daniel.axtens at canonical.com>
---
 fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
index e09438612607..54d11248910c 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ static int cachefiles_read_backing_file_one(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 			goto installed_new_backing_page;
 		if (ret != -EEXIST)
 			goto nomem_page;
+		put_page(newpage);
+		newpage = NULL;
 	}
 
 	/* we've installed a new backing page, so now we need to start
@@ -511,6 +513,8 @@ static int cachefiles_read_backing_file(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 				goto installed_new_backing_page;
 			if (ret != -EEXIST)
 				goto nomem;
+			put_page(newpage);
+			newpage = NULL;
 		}
 
 		/* we've installed a new backing page, so now we need
@@ -535,7 +539,10 @@ static int cachefiles_read_backing_file(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 					    netpage->index, cachefiles_gfp);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			if (ret == -EEXIST) {
+				put_page(backpage);
+				backpage = NULL;
 				put_page(netpage);
+				netpage = NULL;
 				fscache_retrieval_complete(op, 1);
 				continue;
 			}
@@ -608,6 +615,8 @@ static int cachefiles_read_backing_file(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 					    netpage->index, cachefiles_gfp);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			if (ret == -EEXIST) {
+				put_page(backpage);
+				backpage = NULL;
 				put_page(netpage);
 				fscache_retrieval_complete(op, 1);
 				continue;
-- 
2.17.1