NACK: [Bionic][PATCH 0/2] Support for WiFi and Bluetooth LEDs on the Edge Gateways
stefan.bader at canonical.com
Wed Oct 17 10:09:33 UTC 2018
On 17.10.18 11:42, Jesse Sung wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:42 PM Stefan Bader <stefan.bader at canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 16.10.18 16:07, Wen-chien Jesse Sung wrote:
>>> BugLink: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1512997
>>> BugLink: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1512999
>>> == Impact ==
>>> The Wifi and Bluetooth LEDs don't work and keep off all the time on Dell
>>> Edge Gateway 5000/5100.
>>> == Fix ==
>>> The LEDs are connected to GPIO pins on the Marvell WiFi/Bluetooth combo
>>> module, thus they can only be controlled via firmware.
>>> These two patches send the commands to the module when the interface turns
>>> on and off.
>>> == Test case ==
>>> # ifconfig wlan0 [on|off]
>>> # hciconfig hci0 [on|off]
>>> and see if those LEDs work properly.
>>> == Risk of Regression ==
>>> PCI sub IDs of the host bridge are used to determine if we're really
>>> running on an Edge Gateway, and we already have these patches in Xenial
>>> kernels quite a while. Risk should be reasonably low.
>>> Wen-chien Jesse Sung (2):
>>> UBUNTU: SAUCE: mwifiex: Switch WiFi LED state according to the device
>>> UBUNTU: SAUCE: Bluetooth: Support for LED on Edge Gateways
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h | 18 ++++++++
>>> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c | 5 ++-
>>> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h | 6 +++
>>> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 10 +++++
>>> .../net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmd.c | 29 +++++++++++++
>>> .../wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c | 2 +
>>> .../net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c | 18 ++++++++
>>> 8 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> Both bug links refer to bug reports which have been closed already. And while we
>> are at this (as I said in some other reply) in general one submission to the
>> mailing list should be for a single bug report. Either duplicate them or create
>> a new bug report to keep everything together.
> They are closed for Xenial, not Bionic.
> They are nominated to Bionic now, sorry for the confusion.
>> Also since the old bug reports were closed a while ago, is this something that
>> should have gone to Cosmic, too? Or even upstream?
> We would need them in the Bionic kernel. Will try upstream and see how it goes.
No, sorry, this will not go in like that. Those bugs had the devel task set to
"fix released" which means if that were true they should have been included in
the Yakkety kernel and from there would be carried forward and would already be
Please open a new bug about missing LEDs support and nominate Bionic, Cosmic,
and DD. So that those SAUCE patches are not lost again and we have the same
problem in 20.04. And then re-submit those patches with that new bug reference.
>> kernel-team mailing list
>> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the kernel-team