[C][PATCH 1/1] UBUNTU: SAUCE: fscache: Fix race in decrementing refcount of op->npages
Daniel Axtens
daniel.axtens at canonical.com
Fri Oct 12 01:10:35 UTC 2018
From: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri at gmail.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797314
[Trace]
seen this in 4.4.x kernels and the same bug affects fscache in latest upstreams kernels.
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.880898] FS-Cache:
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.880920] FS-Cache: Assertion failed
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.880934] FS-Cache: 0 > 0 is false
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.881001] ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.881017] kernel BUG at /usr/src/linux-4.4.0/fs/fscache/operation.c:449!
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.881040] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
...
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.892659] Call Trace:
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.893506] [<ffffffffc1464cf9>] cachefiles_read_copier+0x3a9/0x410 [cachefiles]
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.894374] [<ffffffffc037e272>] fscache_op_work_func+0x22/0x50 [fscache]
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.895180] [<ffffffff81096da0>] process_one_work+0x150/0x3f0
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.895966] [<ffffffff8109751a>] worker_thread+0x11a/0x470
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.896753] [<ffffffff81808e59>] ? __schedule+0x359/0x980
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.897783] [<ffffffff81097400>] ? rescuer_thread+0x310/0x310
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.898581] [<ffffffff8109cdd6>] kthread+0xd6/0xf0
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.899469] [<ffffffff8109cd00>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.900477] [<ffffffff8180d0cf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
Jun 25 11:32:08 kernel: [4740718.901514] [<ffffffff8109cd00>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[Problem]
atomic_sub(n_pages, &op->n_pages);
if (atomic_read(&op->n_pages) <= 0)
fscache_op_complete(&op->op, true);
The code in fscache_retrieval_complete is using atomic_sub followed by an atomic_read.
This causes two threads doing a decrement of pages to race with each other seeing the op->refcount 0 at same time,
and end up calling fscache_op_complete in both the threads leading to the OOPs.
[Fix]
The fix is trivial to use atomic_sub_return instead of two calls.
Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri at gmail.com>
(cherry-picked-then-modified from
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs/2018-September/msg00001.html
The message has been on-list since 21 September 2018 and has
received no feedback whatsoever.
I have cleaned up the commit message a little bit and dropped a
whitespace change, but no other changes have been made.)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <daniel.axtens at canonical.com>
---
include/linux/fscache-cache.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fscache-cache.h b/include/linux/fscache-cache.h
index 34cf0fdd7dc7..a2cb13b9917b 100644
--- a/include/linux/fscache-cache.h
+++ b/include/linux/fscache-cache.h
@@ -196,8 +196,7 @@ static inline void fscache_enqueue_retrieval(struct fscache_retrieval *op)
static inline void fscache_retrieval_complete(struct fscache_retrieval *op,
int n_pages)
{
- atomic_sub(n_pages, &op->n_pages);
- if (atomic_read(&op->n_pages) <= 0)
+ if (atomic_sub_return(n_pages, &op->n_pages) <= 0)
fscache_op_complete(&op->op, false);
}
--
2.17.1
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list