ACK(ish): [Trusty][Xenial][PATCH 1/1] v3: CVE-2015-1350 fs: Avoid premature clearing of capabilities
Khaled Elmously
khalid.elmously at canonical.com
Fri Jan 26 15:14:46 UTC 2018
On 2018-01-23 12:32:49 , Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 13.12.2017 03:15, Khalid Elmously wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
> >
> >
> > Currently, notify_change() clears capabilities or IMA attributes by
> > calling security_inode_killpriv() before calling into ->setattr. Thus it
> > happens before any other permission checks in inode_change_ok() and user
> > is thus allowed to trigger clearing of capabilities or IMA attributes
> > for any file he can look up e.g. by calling chown for that file. This is
> > unexpected and can lead to user DoSing a system.
> >
> > Fix the problem by calling security_inode_killpriv() at the end of
> > inode_change_ok() instead of from notify_change(). At that moment we are
> > sure user has permissions to do the requested change.
> >
> >
> > (backported from commit 030b533c4fd4d2ec3402363323de4bb2983c9cee)
> > [kmously: This is a re-implementation of the upstream commit that doesn't include all the refactoring that was done in upstream)
> >
> > CVE-2015-1350
> >
> >
> > References: CVE-2015-1350
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously at canonical.com>
> Acked-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader at canonical.com>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
>
> Based on the suggestions from Thadeu this looks ok. Personally I am not 100%
> sure whether the usage of d_obtain_alias() is valid or not.
Yes, I thought as much, which I stated in my response to Thadeu on 2017-12-11.
For what it's worth, I had also sent the complete set of patches (9 in total) needed for this CVE on 2017-12-07 - so you can review/accept that instead, if you prefer.
>
> -Stefan
>
> > fs/attr.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/attr.c b/fs/attr.c
> > index df05bc167360..870d45103f29 100644
> > --- a/fs/attr.c
> > +++ b/fs/attr.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int inode_change_ok(const struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr)
> >
> > /* If force is set do it anyway. */
> > if (ia_valid & ATTR_FORCE)
> > - return 0;
> > + goto kill_priv;
> >
> > /* Make sure a caller can chown. */
> > if ((ia_valid & ATTR_UID) && !chown_ok(inode, attr->ia_uid))
> > @@ -95,6 +95,20 @@ int inode_change_ok(const struct inode *inode, struct iattr *attr)
> > return -EPERM;
> > }
> >
> > +kill_priv:
> > + /* User has permission for the change */
> > + if (ia_valid & ATTR_KILL_PRIV) {
> > + int error;
> > + struct dentry *dentry;
> > +
> > + dentry = d_obtain_alias(inode);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
> > + error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
> > + dput(dentry);
> > + return error;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_change_ok);
> > @@ -250,13 +264,11 @@ int notify_change(struct dentry * dentry, struct iattr * attr, struct inode **de
> > if (!(ia_valid & ATTR_MTIME_SET))
> > attr->ia_mtime = now;
> > if (ia_valid & ATTR_KILL_PRIV) {
> > - attr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_KILL_PRIV;
> > - ia_valid &= ~ATTR_KILL_PRIV;
> > error = security_inode_need_killpriv(dentry);
> > - if (error > 0)
> > - error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
> > - if (error)
> > + if (error < 0)
> > return error;
> > + if (error == 0)
> > + ia_valid = attr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_KILL_PRIV;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> >
>
>
Khaled
> --
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list