ACK: [RESEND][PATCH 0/3][SRU Artful] Workaround Falkor erratum 1041

[Kleber Souza]

On 01/04/18 18:43, dann frazier wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/1738497
> 
> All clean cherry-picks from upstream, other than a trivial Kconfig offset
> adjustment.
> 
> Shanker Donthineni (2):
>   arm64: Define cputype macros for Falkor CPU
>   arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041
> 
> dann frazier (1):
>   UBUNTU: [Config] CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_E1041=y
> 
>  Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt    |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                        | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h        | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h          |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S             |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S             |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S                  |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/relocate_kernel.S       |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S                 |  1 +
>  debian.master/config/annotations          |  2 ++
>  debian.master/config/config.common.ubuntu |  1 +
>  11 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 

The resent patches were referencing the old cover letter and not this
one, so I'm acking the following patches:

[RESEND][PATCH 1/3][SRU Artful] arm64: Define cputype macros for Falkor CPU
[RESEND][PATCH 2/3][SRU Artful] UBUNTU: [Config]
CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_E1041=y
[RESEND][PATCH 3/3][SRU Artful] arm64: Add software workaround for
Falkor erratum 1041

Acked-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza at canonical.com>


Shouldn't patch 2/3 be applied after 3/3 since this is where the config
option is added?

Please don't resend the same patches because they didn't get enough
attention, a reply to the original thread to remind us about it is
enough. Most of the times that a patch didn't get any reply for some
weeks it's because we are in the middle of the previous cycle, or
firefighting CVE's as we are currently. So when we start a new cycle we
make our best not to forget any submission that hasn't been applied yet.
And if you do need to resend some patches, please self NACK the old ones
to help us identify later which patches are the ones that need care.


Thanks,
Kleber