[RESEND] [SRU Artful/Zesty][PATCH] On ARM64 PCIE physical function passthrough guest fails to boot

[Paolo Pisati]

same here - can you resend using the standard SRU format[1], using a
cover letter plus patches, cherry-picking from Linus tree instead of
linux-next?

1: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/StablePatchFormat

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:47:48AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:37:31PM -0600, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Resending SRU request.
>>>>
>>>> Please consider these patches that fixs bug
>>>> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1732804.  The patches were cleanly cherry-picked
>>>> from linux-next and a test kernel is available in the PPA
>>>> https://launchpad.net/~centriq-team/+archive/ubuntu/lp1732804/
>>>> The kernel was tested by me as well as engg at Qualcomm on QDF2400
>>>> platform, and the results are posted to the bug report.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any particular reason you didn't include bionic here? Normally we'd
>>> expect things going into the latest stable kernel to also go into the
>>> devel kernel. Bionic already has the first patch from 4.14 stable
>>> updates, but not the second.
>>
>>
>> Also noting that while the patches say cherry picked from linux-next
>> they are actually in Linus' tree as of 4.15-rc1.
>
>
> At the time I submitted these patches (Nov) these were in linux-next. I
> resent those same patches again after talking to jsalisbury because these
> patches were missed in the last SRU cycle. Would you want me to resubmit
> with cherry picks from Linus tree? let me know and I can do that.
>
>>
>>
>
> --
> ============================
> Manoj Iyer
> Ubuntu/Canonical
> ARM Servers - Cloud
> ============================
>
> --
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team



-- 
bye,
p.